Discussion about this post

User's avatar
CyberneticOstrich's avatar

Good article, but you're not taking the problem seriously enough.

I'm very much in the "hard intellectual work is its own reward" camp, but you're missing the thing that makes this problematic. I've been in postgraduate computer science courses - packed full of international students - where the lecturer openly identified ~50% of the course as having provably cheated on the first assignment, and was forbidden by the Uni admin from engaging in disciplinary action. What do you reckon happened on the second assignment?

Coupled with economic inequality, it's even worse. Assuming Mummy and Daddy aren't bankrolling your study experience, and you need to take a shitty student job -- why waste your time being the guy who does his 20 hours a week and comes home to pull all-nighters when you could be doing 35 hours a week plus twenty minutes of prompt composition and that's your studies handled?

It's pernicious, it's bad for truth and knowledge and thought, and it's a systemic wrecker of both decency and competence.

Expand full comment
Gunter Kuhnle's avatar

I might be a bit more positive about AI - I use it as some kind of a PA who can draft, organise, suggest and refine. And it does it fairly well - and in contrast to Grok, ChatGPT really learns and gets to know your style.

People will continue to learn by themselves, but they might focus more on what really interests them - and the risk might be that they skip fundamentals (which are always boring) and then struggle with the more advanced things. I assume it's up to us to find ways to deal with it.

What students apparently do is to get AI to create revision plans and suggest resources - which sounds like a sensible use, although I'm not always sure it makes the best suggestions ...

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts