Comments about that ZOE (UK): Take care with today's figure. The historical revision was larger than usual (upwards). In the revised time series, the value 3 days ago was 160k, not 155k. Hypothetically, if someone was graphing day-to-day growth rate "by publish date", it may be safer to ignore the latest red cross: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OkfOmcOqmWwplq3mvMVOxL9PlFEZ1VEN/view
Comments about that ZOE (UK): Take care with today's figure. The historical revision was larger than usual (upwards). In the revised time series, the value 3 days ago was 160k, not 155k. Hypothetically, if someone was graphing day-to-day growth rate "by publish date", it may be safer to ignore the latest red cross: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OkfOmcOqmWwplq3mvMVOxL9PlFEZ1VEN/view
Graphing ZOE against ONS (England), log scale: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1elR1BlpDbQs844qjUm4JB-vhDvSlqPZw/view
Graphing ZOE *growth rate* against ONS (England): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1U86_xBpc8dnvW6uiJZReKWNsKKPx_hjv/view
Data source: https://sourcejedi.github.io/2022/01/31/zoe-covid-study.html
Thanks, I've added a reference to this comment in the main text above.