I find it very interesting that there are those like yourself, that correctly test the hypothesis against the facts and then reject the hypothesis if the facts don't fit, whilst astonishingly there are others, many with a scientific education who simply try to reject or ignore the facts that don't fit with their preferred hypothesis. I see that as a significant failure in scientific education.
(I do accept that sometimes it is the facts that need refining as in the example where deaths plotted by date of reporting leads to a very different interpretation to deaths plotted by date of occurrence.)
Thank you for your calm measured analysis and clear explanations for non mathematical/scientifical people like me. Have you put it on Threads? There are a lot of ex-Twitter people over there.
I find it very interesting that there are those like yourself, that correctly test the hypothesis against the facts and then reject the hypothesis if the facts don't fit, whilst astonishingly there are others, many with a scientific education who simply try to reject or ignore the facts that don't fit with their preferred hypothesis. I see that as a significant failure in scientific education.
(I do accept that sometimes it is the facts that need refining as in the example where deaths plotted by date of reporting leads to a very different interpretation to deaths plotted by date of occurrence.)
I appreciate the update. I’m immune suppressed. I’d still long for a vaccine that stopped transmission.
Thank you for your calm measured analysis and clear explanations for non mathematical/scientifical people like me. Have you put it on Threads? There are a lot of ex-Twitter people over there.
I love the way that you analyse the facts, manage not to be swayed by opinions, and summarise what we know, rather than what others feel, Oliver 👍.
Fascinating insight! Thanks for your expertise!
Well reasoned review of where we are now versus where we have been. Thanks for the update.